End-of-life decision making: rethinking the principles of fundamental justice in the context of emerging empirical data.

Québec. Rodriguez v. B.C .(A.G .), [1993 ] 3 S.C .R. 519 [hereinafter Rodriguez]. R. v. Latimer, [1995 ] 8 W .W.R . 609, 126 D.L.R. (4 th) 203 (Sask. C.A.) [h ereinafter Latimer]. In addition to Latim er, see e.g. the recent case of e igh ty-year o ld Be rt Doerksen who assisted in the suicide of his seventy-eight year old wife who had been suffering from arthritis, back problems, heart problems and cancer (Canadian News B ulletins, online: < http://www.rights.org/deathnet/Cnews_ 9901.html)>. R. v. Morrison, [1998 ] N.S .J. No. 75 (P rov. Ct.), online: QL. C. Cassel, “Patient Autonomy as Therapy” in D.W . M ulder, ed ., The Diagnosis and Treatment of Am yotrop hic La teral Sc lerosis, (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1980) at 325. Institute of M edicine, Approaching Death : Im pro ving Ca re a t the E nd o f Life , (Washington, DC: National Acad em y Press , 1997); W orld Health Organization , Cancer Pain Relief and Palliative Care (Geneva: World Health Or gan ization, 1990); R .E. En ck, The M edical Care of Terminally Ill Cancer Patients , (Baltimore: Johns Hop kins U niversity Pre ss, 19 94); R . M elzack & P. W all, The Challenge of Pain, (London: Pengu in Books, 198 8); E S carry, The Bo dy in Pain, (N ew York: O xford U niver sity End-of-Life Decision Making: Rethinking the Principles of Fundamental Justice in the Context of Emerging Empirical Data